|
Mercy Global Concern - 2003

Report on the Commission on the Status of Women 3-14
March 2003
Sisters Lynda Dearlove RSM (Institute GB) and Tina Geiger RSM
(Americas) attended 47th session of the United Nations Commission
on the Status of Women held at the UN in New York.
The commission addressed...
" Women's human rights and elimination of all forms of violence
against women and girls as defined in the Beijing Platform for Action
and the outcome document of the 23rd special session of the General
Assembly (of the UN)."
Tina Geiger RSM:
The two Mercies joined non- governmental organizations (NGO's)
caucus group created to influence the Commission on Women to deal
with and eliminate all forms of sexual violence against women and
girls including pornography, prostitution and trafficking. The caucus
called for member states (i.e. all countries of the UN) to "criminalize
the demand" for sexual services, that is to criminalize those -usually
men- who are part of the demand side of these issues, as well as
decriminalize the "supply side of the issues" -the victims/survivors
of sexual violence. With regard to the victim/survivors of trafficking,
the caucus further asked the Commission on Women to stipulate offering
"trauma specific treatment and services" as well as ensuring "the
safe and voluntary settlement of trafficked persons in either their
own country, the country they were trafficked to or a third country."
Let me put some flesh to these requests. The following is a true
story.
"13-year-old Maria, a waitress in Mexico, is approached by a customer
who tells her that she can make ten times her salary in the USA
waiting on tables. He tells her it's wonderful employment in a safe
neighborhood, and if she's homesick he'll bring her back to Mexico.
She can't lose! Being one of nine children and wanting to help her
family, she discusses the work prospect with her parents who flatly
refuse to let her go and forbid her to speak to this man ever again.
But, Maria, thinking she knows better than her parents, speaks to
the man again and makes plans to meet him outside his hotel to further
discuss the offer. At the hotel, he drives up in a van, and tells
her to hop in, and she is taken to the boarder miles away, where
she joins dozens of other girls gathered there. They are told to
pick up a backpack and a water bottle and follow the men guides
as they commence to walk for days through the desert. Finally, exhausted
and hungry, they are picked up in yet another van and transported
to a trailer camp in Florida. There, they are met by a man who tells
them he purchased them; he now owns them, and they are his property.
To gain their freedom they must pay their debt by working it off
sexually servicing men - 10-20 men on weekdays, 30 men on weekends.
If they refuse, they are refused food, shelter and are physically
beaten until, at some point the girls succumb to their captors will.
Maria, now a prostitute in a Florida brothel is one of the 40,000
women and girls trafficked into the USA each year for a sex trade
as lucrative as drug and arms dealing.
In one of the caucus sessions, Dr. Joyce Barak who led the Task
force on Violence against women, shared her research on survivors
of trafficking for sexual exploitation:
'Survivors of trafficking have experienced multiple trauma events,
often including repeated rapes, gang rape or other forms of sexual
torture and violence; imprisonment; threats of violence and death;
prostitution, witnessing torture and murder; isolation and threats
against family members. Women and girls forced in to pornography
or prostitution experience the additional trauma of psychological
humiliation, which may be exacerbated by social norms and values.
Numerous trafficking victims /survivors suffer from complex posttraumatic
stress syndrome: a large-scale break down in social emotional physical
and cognitive functioning with severe impairments that may last
a lifetime. Effective measure to rescue girls and women from the
slavery of human trafficking require effective trauma rehabilitation.'
(Statement on Trafficking in Women and Girls: International Society
for Traumatic Stress Studies, March 2003)
After days of meeting in caucus, listening to the commissions deliberations
and lobbying the delegates of the commission with the caucus stated
positions, the resulting document will most likely not include any
statement asking member states to eliminate all forms of sexual
violence against women and girls including pornography, prostitution
and trafficking. There are some member states in which pornography
is not considered harmful, and there are three member states including
Australia where prostitution is legalized. The document will most
likely state sexual exploitation as a form of violence against women
and "suggest" member states "curb the demand " or "discourage the
demand" for sexual exploitation. At the end of the two weeks, member
states will most likely be charged with providing "services" to
victim survivors although those service will not be delineated...which
of course leaves a loophole for member states to wiggle out of any
specified mandated services. With regard to the future fate of victim/survivors
of trafficking the simple addition of the word preferred still keeps
the future of those women and girls quite precariously dangling
in the discretion of member states migration/immigration laws/or
whims as the Commission most likely will pass the following wording:
"Ensure the safe and preferably voluntary return of trafficked
persons to their State of nationality or permanent residence...."
The final debates about the exact wording of the final document
are still being negotiated.
You'll find The Commission on the Status of Women's outcome document can be
found at www.un.org/womenwatch/daw
Suggestions for Action:
Please read it carefully and write your ambassador or delegate
to the Commission lobbying on the following points....
1. The clear link between trafficking in women and girls and prostitution
and pornography. Without male demand for pornography and prostitution
there would be not trafficking of human persons. Governments must
address this demand by decriminalizing the supply side-prostituted
girls and women and criminalizing the demand side-criminalizing
traffickers and any purchaser of sexual services, using the Swedish
government which has criminalize demand and decriminalized the victim/survivor
resulting in a 50% decrease both prostitution and trafficking in
only 4 years, as a global model.
2. Citing the research above, member states must create, and implement
that is provide trauma specific services and rehabilitation for
victims / survivors of pornography, prostitution and trafficking.
Submitted to Deirdre Mullen by Tina Geiger, RSM in gratitude and
accountability for being selected to attend the 47th session of
the UN Commission on the Status of Women.
Lynda Dearlove RSM
The United Nations General Assembly has acknowledged that:
"Sexual exploitation through prostitution and other forms of sexual exploitation
and contemporary forms of slavery are serious violations of human rights"...
and yet we Mercy women present at Commission On The Status Of Women, have found
ourselves sitting in a room with member states debating this from polarized
positions e.g. from Australia, Netherlands where all aspects of prostitution
are legal and seen as "not to represent a harmful practice" through the various
spectrums to where all aspects are illegal and the woman is likely to be stoned.
Within the international debate there are several clearly stated perspectives
concerning the links between prostitution and trafficking. The pro-prostitution
lobby, mainly from within countries with legalized prostitution argues that
prostitution is work and can be chosen freely, as such women should be free
to pursue their choice in the name of self-determination and integrity, over
their lives and their bodies. And yet the concept of free will requires the
existence of several possible options to choose from and the control of the
person in making a choice. Further to this they argue that prostitution and
trafficking in women should be discussed separately and that trafficking in
women is only a serious problem when women have been trafficked by force or
coercion.
In reality what kind of "choice" do these women ands girls have?
Jo is 18, since the age of 12 she has supported herself by exchanging sexual
services to meet her basic needs... at various times this has included for her...food,
protection, shelter (albeit in a car), clothing and a variety of drugs. She
was introduced to survival sex whilst in a children's home...she had a daughter
at 14 (the father was her 'boyfriend/pimp/drug-dealer), who has since been adopted.
She is currently attempting to remain drug free and not "work" whilst exploring
the possibility of getting some sort of education. She desperately desires to
work with children but her past history compounded by her criminal record for
'prostitution' militates against this.
We know that a number of oppressive conditions increase the likelihood of women
and girls being drawn into prostitution by pimps and traffickers, such as living
in poverty, being homeless and being drug dependent, gender inequality, sexual
and racial discrimination as well as sexual, physical and psychological violence
by male relative, boyfriends, husbands, pimps and others. When a woman has been
used as an object for male sexual satisfaction since she was a girl, she will
eventually believe what they keep repeating; that the only value she has is
her sex. Her body no longer belongs to her, and the perpetrators have destroyed
her self-respect and self-confidence. To talk about choice in this context becomes
both cruel and meaningless. When we allow the prostitution defenders to blame
the victims of prostitution for their victimization, we collaborate with them,
male violence is thus obscured and focus is taken off the perpetrators. Instead
of talking about prostitution as choice, we must ask ourselves; "If prostitution
is a free choice, why is it that it is always the women and girls who have the
fewest alternatives who are the ones who end up in prostitution?"
They further argue that women have been exploited and violated by men only
if they did not "consent " to the violation, with the unwritten assumption that
"prostituted women', by accepting the money handed to them by their buyers,
have given consent to whatever violation their buyers subject them to. This
analysis puts the responsibility for "prostitution" on the prostituted women
and girls and does not take into consideration the systemic oppression and subordination
of females by males and men's eroticisation of females as objects for their
sexual "pleasure".
Like all forms of male violence against females, "prostitution" is carried
out by men (pimps, traffickers and buyers) who use their inherent power to dominate
and control comparatively powerless women and girls, using the same manipulative
tactics as violent and abusive male partners and relatives do. Both battered
and prostituted women sometimes enter abusive situations seemingly "voluntarily".
They may stay in or return to violent men, and they may deny the abuse, and
defend the abusers. And yet no one will argue that women, who stay in relationships
with abusive men for economic or other reasons, for the children etc are exercising
free will or pursuing their liberation. Pimps, traffickers and buyers subject
women in prostitution to brutal rapes and physical abuse to break down their
resistance and to "season" them into "prostitution". They had to endure all
kinds of bodily violations and invasions and must "service" many buyers - anonymous
males - every day while pretending that they enjoy it. Also, many have acquired
sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS from the buyers and pimps.
The pimps, traffickers and buyers also often film and photograph the violation,
and sell the films as pornography and post these photos on Internet web sites.
The effects on prostituted women's physical, mental and emotional health are,
of course, grave and cause serious long-term physical and emotional harm. International
studies show that prostituted women suffer similar serious psychological injuries;
as war veterans and survivors of torture such as flash backs, anxiety, depressions,
sleep disturbances and stress. Suicide and suicide attempts are common and murder
is a fact if life for all prostituted women and girls (e.g. in Canada their
mortality rate is estimated to be 40 times higher than the national average).
Additionally they are the most routinely searched-out victims of male sexual
murders, who take advantage of their vulnerability, knowing that they can commit
these rapes and murders relatively undisturbed.
As previously mentioned, in recent years, the pro-prostitution groups and countries
where prostitution is regulated or legalised have made many attempts to disconnect
trafficking in women and children from prostitution and the prostitution industry.
Because these groups argue for the right of women to "prostitute themselves",
and because these countries have created a profitable local prostitution market,
they want to redefine trafficking and leave out all mention of prostitution.
They suggest that trafficking should be given a broader definition, in which
all transport of "people" by force or coercion over national borders should
be included. By focusing only on the abusive conditions of trafficking, which
they see as human rights violations, rather than on its purpose, they effectively
play down the violence of prostitution. Further more, women and girls who are
trafficked for other purposes such as domestic labour or as mail order brides
often end up being sexually exploited and, in some cases, put into prostitution.
In fact, the actual existence of prostitution renders possible and demands the
trafficking and trade in women's bodies. This reasoning takes the seriousness
out of trafficking in women and children for purposes other than prostitution.
By maintaining that the link between trafficking and prostitution is the most
tenuous, these groups and counties contribute to the separation between women
who "deserve" to be protected from serious human rights violations: the women
who have been trafficked across national borders under severely abusive conditions,
and women who suffer the same atrocious violations and extreme violence, but
who are in local prostitution. One of the most important prerequisites for the
sale and trafficking in women is the existence of local prostitution markets,
where men are willing and able to by women and girls from there own country.
These markets are easily expandable and there is always room for the traffickers,
pimps and procurers to create new demands.
Is there any other possibility?
On January 1, 1999, the Swedish law that prohibits the purchase of sexual services
entered into force. This law recognises that it is the men who buy women for
sexual services who should be criminalized and not the prostituted women. In
July 2002, a new law against trafficking in human beings for the sexual purposes
entered into force in Sweden. This means that all the links in the prostitution
and women-trafficking chain have been made a criminal offence in Sweden: the
buyers of women and children in prostitution, pimps and traffickers in women.
Women are no longer criminalized and funding and services are in place to enable
women to make real choices, alongside of this the demand is now firmly criminalised
and all buyers are prosecuted, for the first offence they are fined but they
can be imprisoned for up to six months. Effective enforcement of the law is
dependent on the police, most of whom are men and identify with male values
and stereotypes, this has effected successful implementation of this law in
some localities but much work is being done to change attitudes an practices.
Does the law live up to its expectations?
- To enable women to get out of prostitution
- To get common view that prostitution is always violence against women.
60% of women have now left prostitution, they report that the legislation provides
both the incentive and the support to escape. Additionally the normative function
is also evident, 80% of the population supports the new legislation, giving
a clear collective message that woman and children are not for sale in Sweden!
As for trafficking, over the last 3-5 years, the numbers of trafficked women
has not increased (unlike the rest of the European Countries), it seems that
the fall in demand caused by the increased risk to buyers has ceased to make
it a viable financial option for traffickers.
In summary....
There is a clear link between prostitution and the trafficking in women and
girls both of which are fueled by men's demand! Without the demand for prostitution
there would be no trafficking in women and girls for prostitution. Governments
must address this demand by decriminalizing prostituted women and girls and
by criminalizing the traffickers and purchasers of sexual services. e.g. the
Swedish model, which has enacted a law that criminalizes the purchasers of sexual,
services and protects the survivors of prostitution. Victims of trafficking
and prostitution should be provided with opportunities to work free of sexual
exploitation. Further to this whilst providing both training and education to
enable women to make alternative choices, support services need to be put in
place (including trauma specific counseling services) thus enabling the women
to move beyond the confines of sexual exploitation and into economically viable
work.
The extract quoted earlier refers to a young woman I worked with for the past
6 years (since she was infact still a child. I am a Mercy Sister working in
the East End of London with Providence Row Charity, which has had a connection
with Mercy for 140 years. We are currently expanding our services to women by
developing a project for women fleeing cycles of abuse, paying particular attention
to the needs women involved in survival sex, that will embrace outreach, drop
in facilities, access to specialized services providing accommodation, advice
and information, medical, counseling, training and volunteer opportunities etc.
ldearlove@providencerow.org.uk
|